Case Studies

PROVEN WHERE
THE WORK HAPPENS.

Real aircraft. Real maintenance constraints. Real outcomes. These are the operations that show what deployable aircraft maintenance environments can change.

19 → 6 hAllegiant engine change
$600KForecast annual savings
110 aircraftVueling apron retrofit
<4 aircraftVueling ROI
Operational Evidence

Not product claims. Maintenance outcomes.

The strongest proof is what happens when weather, hangar capacity, programme scale or an AOG event puts pressure on the maintenance operation. These projects show how J.B. Roche environments were used to remove those constraints.

CASE 01
Allegiant Air · A320 · Des Moines · AOG

19 hours became 6.

With no hangar space available and an outside temperature of 8°F, Allegiant expected an A320 engine change to take up to 19 hours because mechanics would need to rotate out of the cold. IglooMX® created a heated protected workspace and the engine swap was completed in 6 hours.

8°FOutside temperature
$600KForecast annual maintenance savings
Read original case study →
CASE 02
Vueling Airlines + STS · A320 Fleet · Barcelona

110 aircraft. On the apron.

A fleet-wide WiFi antenna retrofit needed an encapsulated working environment, space for a MEWP, cargo-door access and the ability to remain deployed for days. The resulting IglooMX® enclosure enabled the programme to run on the apron rather than consuming scarce hangar capacity.

110Aircraft approved for apron modification
<4Aircraft modifications to ROI
Read original case study →
CASE 03
B777 · Iqaluit, Canada · Emergency Landing

Engine change in Arctic conditions.

After a B777 suffered an engine failure and diverted to Iqaluit, the operation needed a workable maintenance environment without a nearby conventional hangar. A widebody IglooMX® shelter created a heated protected space for the engine-change operation in severe Arctic conditions.

AOGEmergency maintenance requirement
ArcticHeated protected workspace
Read original case study →
Field Proof

Sometimes one sentence says enough.

Not every successful deployment needs a long case study. Customer feedback can capture the operational value just as clearly.

“You saved our fingers in Cordova, Alaska – 3 days and 3° Fahrenheit, No Injuries!”
Alaska Airlines · B737 Engine Change Shelter
COLD-WEATHER MAINTENANCE

A protected work zone changes the maintenance problem.

The value is not simply covering an aircraft. It is giving technicians a workable environment when weather exposure would otherwise control how quickly and safely the job can be completed.

3 daysMaintenance operation
3°FApprox. −16°C
What The Cases Have In Common

The constraint changes. The engineering logic does not.

Across AOG response, fleet modification and remote widebody maintenance, the result comes from identifying the real operating constraint and building the environment around it.

01WeatherCold, wind and exposure stopped controlling the maintenance programme.
02Hangar capacityThe work moved to the apron or remote site instead of waiting for a conventional bay.
03AccessThe enclosure accommodated the MEWP, tooling, engine or technician routes required for the task.
04Business caseThe environment improved utilisation, maintenance time or programme economics rather than existing as standalone equipment.
Your Maintenance Constraint

What is stopping the job today?

Discuss Your Requirement →